Category Archives: Procedural Law

Civil Trial

Civil Trial in Canada

THE LAWYER AT THE CIVIL TRIAL: Contents

This covers:

  • Contempt Of Court
  • Witnesses
  • Perjury
  • Tactics
  • Argument
  • Withdrawal (see below)
  • Dealing With The Other Side
  • Costs
  • Fees In Civil Litigation
  • Other Tribunals
  • The Lawyer’s Legal Liability
  • Duties To The Court (see below)

Withdrawal includes:

  • what constitutes “good cause”
  • what is “notice appropriate in the circumstances”
  • the lawyer’s duties upon withdrawal
  • duties of the successor lawyer
  • conflict of interest
  • court’s rôle on lawyer’s withdrawal

Duties To The Court includes:

  • basic duties
  • the lawyer giving evidence
  • witnesses
  • client’s directions
  • settlement
  • other items

THE LAWYER IN CIVIL PRE-TRIAL: Contents

This covers:

  • Civil Pre-Trial Defined
  • Settlement (see below)
  • Witnesses
  • Discovery
  • The Pre-Trial Brief
  • Dealing With The Other Side
  • Other Pre-Trial Perspectives
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution

Settlement includes:

  • settlement conduct for the lawyer
  • authority to settle
  • summary on settlement – authority

Judge

Judge in Canada

The Appointment of Judges to the Supreme Court of Canada

Although the Governor General legally has an unfettered discretion in the appointment of qualified men and women to be judges of the Supreme Court, since the 1970’s the governments of the day have, with some exceptions, followed the practice of consulting with other groups, such as the Canadian Bar Association, before exercising this appointment power.

Since 1949, a pattern of regional representation has been maintained under which three judges come from Quebec as required by statute, while by informal custom, there is a rough allocation (that is varied from time to time) of three judges from Ontario, two from the western provinces and one from the Atlantic provinces.

In the United States, where Supreme Court judges are nominated by the President, but must be confirmed by the Senate (representing the states), there is no procedure to “break” a deadlock.

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms reduced the number of division of powers cases heard by the Supreme Court and increased the number of cases concerning individual rights. A provincial or national bias–assuming that any such bias exists–is largely irrelevant to deciding Charter cases.

In the United States, they have a double veto. The fact that the Senate rejected 20 presidential nominees did not really create any insurmountable problems. Two elected people usually manage to reach an agreement.

THE LAWYER AS JUDGE: Contents

This covers:

  • Historical Perspectives (the Canadian perspective)
  • Appointment Of Judges In Canada
  • Judges’ Powers (see below)
  • Judges’ Duties
  • Judges’ Independence (see below)
  • Judges’ Conduct – Other
  • Codes of Conduct
  • Discipline, Canadian Judicial Council (and provincial boards)
  • Judges, Biases

Judges’ Powers include:

  • the power to control court process
  • the power to decide
  • the power to change the common law
  • immunity from suit, proceedings
  • inherent powers respecting jurisdiction

Judges’ Independence includes:

  • constitutional entrenchment
  • perceived encroachments on independence
  • independence to speak out

Judge

This section offers an overview of Judge under Canadian law, reporting on the provincial jurisdiction differences.

Concept of Judge in Ontario

This section provides the essential definition of Judge relevant or under the laws of Ontario: The person authorized to determine legal matters in court.

Definition of Case Management Judge or Master

Case Management Judge or Master meaning or descrpition: court official assigned to each case managed case to ensure court control over the case on its way to trial (Source of this concept of Case Management Judge or Master: emp.ca/books/318-5)