Statute of Westminster

Statute of Westminster (1931)

The Statute of Westminster was the last of the Imperial Acts of the Parliament of Great Britain applicable to all the Dominions. It granted Canada, Newfoundland, New Zealand, Australia, the Union of South Africa and the Irish Free State what amounted to independence.

As in most advances in British constitutional practices, the Statute of Westminster did not constitute a clear break with the past. It merely only consecrated practices that were already firmly established. In the case of Canada, one could consider that the road to independence started with the grant, to the several colonies, of a legislature and eventually of Responsible Government (1847-48). Confederation (1867) crowned this period in so far as, for all intent and purposes, the provinces and the Dominion government obtained full control of all internal matters. The next sixty years were to see a gradual take-over by the federal government of the responsibilities in external sovereignty that had remained, to this point, in the hands of the government and Parliament of Great Britain.

Important dates in the road to independence were the withdrawal of the British troops from Canada (1871), the negotiation of the Washington Treaty (1871) where for the first time a Canadian was included in a British negotiating team to sign a treaty on behalf of Canada, the establishment of the Supreme Court of Canada (1875), the creation of a High Commissioner’s Office in London to “represent” Canada (1878), Macdonald’s refusal to send Canadian troops to the Sudan (1885), the last use of the veto (1873) and reserve powers by Britain (1886) under ss. 55-57 of the Constitution Act, 1867, and the establishment of the Department of External Affairs (1909). It was the First World War that accelerated the process to independence. The major colonies played a role of such magnitude that it could not be said, by the end of the war, that they were mere colonies of Great Britain. Hence, the international status of Canada evolved rapidly in the post-World War period: in 1919, Canada signed the Treaty of Versailles and was elected as an independent member of the League of Nations ( a Canadian, Raoul Dandurand became a President of the League in 1925); in 1923, Canada signed for the first time a treaty on its own (Halibut Treaty) and, finally in 1926, the Balfour resolution was adopted at the Imperial Conference. Arthur Balfour presented this resolution to the Imperial conference of the self-governing dominions. In it, Great Britain recognized that the Dominions were “autonomous communities within the British Empire, equal in status, in no way subordinate to one another in any aspect of their domestic or external affairs, though united by a common allegiance to the Crown and freely associated as members of the British Commonwealth of Nations”.

Thus, by 1931, Canada and the other Dominions had become “autonomous communities… equal in status” to Great Britain. There were some problems resulting from the federal nature of Canada connected with the accession to independence. If Britain was not responsible for Canada any more, who would receive the power to alter Canada’s constitution? A Dominion-Provincial conference in 1927, considered this issue. The federal Minister of Justice, Ernest Lapointe, proposed that Great Britain confer upon the federal Parliament powers to change the constitution subject to the rule, for ordinary amendments to the Constitutional Act, 1867, the consent of the majority of the provinces should be obtained, while for fundamental changes – the distribution of powers and minority rights (ss. 93, 133) – the unanimous consent of the provinces would be required. The provinces rejected the report of the Minister of Justice as too vague. Later, in 1930, the Premier of Ontario, G.H. Ferguson, presented a strongly worded memorandum expounding the Confederation pact theory by which there would be need of unanimous agreement between provinces before the Constitution Act be patriated to Canada. The Prime Minister of Quebec, Alexandre Taschereau, supported the views of Ontario. Consequently, the Statute of Westminster granted independence to Canada except in relation to the amendment of the constitution. Until 1982, all attempts to patriate the constitution were unsuccessful so that Canada continued to seek amendments in London and an element of colonial status remained in force (one might also add that appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council existed until abolished in 1949).

Terms of the Statute

Any alteration in the law governing the Succession to the Throne would require the assent of the Dominion Parliaments as well as that of the United Kingdom.

No law of the Parliament of Britain shall extend to any of the Dominions “otherwise than at the request and with the consent of that Dominion.” Thus the Colonial Laws Validity Act, 1865 (28 & 29 Vict. c. 63) was repealed (s. 1).

The Parliaments of the Dominions obtained “full power to make laws having extra-territorial operation.” (s. 3)

Art. 7 stipulated that “Nothing in this Act shall be deemed to apply to the repeal, amendment or alteration of British North America Acts, 1967 to 1930 (now renamed Constitution Acts), or any order, rule or regulation made thereunder.”

S. 7 (3) stated “The powers conferred by this Act upon the Parliament of Canada or upon the legislatures of the Provinces shall be restricted to the enactment of laws in relation to matters within the competence of the Parliament of Canada or any of the legislatures of the Provinces respectively.”

© 2001 Claude Bélanger, Marianopolis College


Law is our Passion


This entry about Statute of Westminster has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0) licence, which permits unrestricted use and reproduction, provided the author or authors of the Statute of Westminster entry and the Encyclopedia of Law are in each case credited as the source of the Statute of Westminster entry. Please note this CC BY licence applies to some textual content of Statute of Westminster, and that some images and other textual or non-textual elements may be covered by special copyright arrangements. For guidance on citing Statute of Westminster (giving attribution as required by the CC BY licence), please see below our recommendation of "Cite this Entry".

Cite this entry

Legal Citations Generator
(2014, 08). Statute of Westminster lawi.ca Retrieved 06, 2017, from https://lawi.ca/
"Statute of Westminster" lawi.ca. 08 2014. 06 2017 <https://lawi.ca/>
"Statute of Westminster" lawi.ca. lawi.ca, 08 2014. Web. 06 2017. <https://lawi.ca/>
"Statute of Westminster" lawi.ca. 08, 2014. Accesed 06 2017. https://lawi.ca/
International, 'Statute of Westminster' (lawi.ca 2014) <https://lawi.ca/> accesed 2017 June 12






Usage Metrics

168 Views


Google Scholar: Search for Statute of Westminster Related Content

 

Schema Summary

  • Article Name: Statute of Westminster
  • Author: International
  • Description: Share this on WhatsAppStatute of Westminster (1931) The Statute of Westminster was the last of the Imperial Acts of the [...]


This entry was last updated: November 4, 2014

Author of this Entry:
This entry of the legal Encyclopedia was posted in Constitutional Law and published on on by You can follow any added content to this entry through the RSS feed. You may skip to the end and expand the entry. You will take 2 minutes and 55 seconds to read this entry.

Caution: This Canadian legal encyclopedia contains clearly written statements of Canadian legal principle based on common law and legislation regarding Statute of Westminster and other areas of law in Canada . But, legal information is not the same as legal advice (which involves applying laws, about Statute of Westminster and other topics, to particular individuals and organizations and their particular circumstances). It is always a good idea to consult with an attorney to obtain advice as to how the law (in relation to Statute of Westminster and other legal subjects) should be interpreted in light of the particularities of your situation. Also, you should be aware that legal aspects impacting Statute of Westminster may change over time and, as such the information contained in this Canadian legal encyclopedia may become out of date.




Constitutional Law in other Legal Encyclopedias



Link Description
Statute of Westminster Constitutional Law Category in the World Legal Wiki Encyclopedia
Statute of Westminster Constitutional Law Category in the European Legal Wiki Encyclopedia
Statute of Westminster Constitutional Law Category in the American Legal Wiki Encyclopedia
Statute of Westminster Constitutional Law Category in the Latin American Legal Wiki Encyclopedia
Statute of Westminster Constitutional Law Category in the UK Legal Wiki Encyclopedia
Statute of Westminster Constitutional Law Category in the Australian Legal Wiki Encyclopedia
Statute of Westminster Constitutional Law Category in the Canadian Legal Wiki Encyclopedia
Back to Top

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *